Showing posts with label Lease. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lease. Show all posts

Tuesday, 23 September 2014

'Lease of Public Open Space' - PART DEUX! The Return of the lease! WRITE BEFORE OCT 1ST

Looks like the council messed up the 'disposal of public space' lease we mentioned here last month, so they've had to re-advertise it & go through the process again!

Despite all of our letters of objection, they STILL GRANTED THE LEASE ANYWAY. Until we pointed out that they had failed to advertise the disposal for 2 consecutive weeks in the Maidenhead Advertiser as they are required to by law. They only did it for one week. 

This is the lease of an area of land in the Winbury School site to the Braywick Court School/Bellevue Place Education Trust, a piece of land that was previously for use by the public, it's the only fenced off part of grassland in the whole of Braywick Park which is dog free, includes some lovely apple trees, and links the Nature Reserve with the Park


There still hasn't been any planning application 
which (according to the drawings and plans they have shown so far) is a massive development on the Winbury site, taking over the Nature Centre - and building a new one in the middle of Braywick park.  


As they are re-advertising this lease, previous letters of objection are Null & Void so please write in again if you did before, and if not, if you object, please write in again! The deadline in October 1st. 


If you object, please write before 1 October to:

Emma-Jane Brewerton, 
Lawyer, Shared Legal Solutions at Wokingham Borough Council,
Civic Offices, 
Shute End, 
Wokingham, 
Berks 
RG40 1WH


Thoughts on the lease that may be helpful if writing to object:

- No objection to the lease of the open space land to BPET were it to facilitate the opening of a school for up to 100 children which did not involve the loss of the Nature Centre.


- OBJECT to the lease of this la
nd to BPET to facilitate the opening of a 210 pupil school for the following reasons:

1.        No planning application has been submitted, much less approved, at this stage and thus it is considered premature to seek the disposal of the land. Given the admissions policy of the school, it is not considered that Bellevue Education Place Trust will be able to demonstrate very special circumstances to warrant development of the new school buildings in the Green Belt. It is understood that the Council is not advertising the public notice for the disposal of the open space outside the Nature Centre until after the planning application has been determined and therefore the same approach should be applied to the open space between the Nature Centre and the former WInbury School.

2.       The orchard area, which forms part of the open space the subject of the public notice, is
the only grassed, dog free area in the whole of Braywick Park. If anyone, especially those with small children, want to have a picnic, this is the one place they can go where there are no dog faeces. The Council knows all too well the problem of dog faeces on the playing pitches in Braywick Park. 

3.       In addition,
the orchard area was improved as part of Transforming Your Patch, a Groundwork project with funding from Britvic. There were a few apple trees in this area which were struggling; the two best trees were kept and the area around them was fenced in and grassed over. What is the reaction of Groundwork and Transforming Your Patch sponsors to the disposal of this land for the construction of a school building? Will Groundwork or the Council need to reimburse the funds obtained from the sponsor? Would Britvic have provided funding had it known the Council was going to turn around a few years later and dispose of the open space?

4.       The shrubs/brambles in the northern part of the open space the subject of the public notice are
a valuable area for wildlife, complementing the Local Nature Reserve (LNR) which is almost adjacent to the north.  The loss of this area will, in a small part, reduce the ecological value of the LNR.     

Given the strong feelings of local residents
regarding the disposal of this land to Bellevue Education Place Trust, we would request that the Head of Leisure Services (who, it is understood, has delegated powers to consider the objections) considers stepping aside and referring the matter to the Cabinet for decision (as it was the Cabinet who precipitously agreed to Braywick Court School in March of this year).  This is clearly an option as set out in paragraph 2.5 of Part 5, Scheme of Delegation to Officers.

FYI: Paragraph 2.5 states ‘Where any function is delegated to an officer, that officer may choose not exercise that function and may, instead, refer a matter to the Council, the Cabinet, Committee or relevant Portfolio Holder for decision as appropriate with the agreement of the appropriate Director’.


As the Council had put the previous notice for the disposal of open space in the paper for one week only (they are required to do it for two consecutive weeks), they have re-advertised the notice this past Thursday and will presumably do so again next week.  So letters of objections need to be in by the 1 October.  Any letters sent the last time are null and void so people need to send new letters.

Here's the notice in the Maidenhead Advertiser last week. Lucky we spotted it right?! Conveniently easy to miss? 

Close-up of the notice.

The area in red is the piece of land this particular lease relates to.


Wednesday, 9 July 2014

Original planned site for the new Nature Centre was smaller & in different position. Negotiation trick?

In the original rough plans for the proposed new Nature Centre it was to the left of the car park, and smaller - not right in the middle of the park as now proposed.

Is this what they are actually aiming for but are asking for something more outrageous as a negotiating technique to get the original plan accepted as a 'concession'?


Building out on this beautiful park to allow the free school to operate at twice the former school's numbers just isn't cool - wherever they decide to TRY TO put the new building.

Is this because the council is desperate for school places because of their own previous planning decisions and allowing overdevelopment in the area?

First rough plans showing area 'H' as location of proposed new building (click to enlarge):


'Expert' photoshop annotation of latest plans for new building, area to left in yellow was original proposed position (click to enlarge):


Monday, 7 July 2014

Braywick Court School Lease Agreement with RBWM

http://www.rbwm.gov.uk/minsys3.nsf/d9c360870262e3708025765d004cf06a/a378e65b2b08ce6380257b1a00508417/$FILE/meetings_140327_cab_braywick_lease_full.pdf

This is the summary below - but link to full document above. 

Drawings show the initial intended location for the Nature Centre, different from what has now been proposed. (Both involve building out onto Braywick Park to allow the School to operate at 2.5 times the capacity it originally was as Winbury - as they plan to take over the existing Nature Centre & put them into a smaller building, actually built on the Park itself!)

The council are promoting the school on the basis it is paid for by central DFE funds so costs the local council very little compared to, say, the Oldfield School Expansion. (Which they ended up in in what could be a similar situation here, RBWM giving permission for the school to expand, and accepting double-sized year groups etc, before securing planning permission for the new site - putting pressure on themselves to grant themselves planning permission despite local's concerns.)

And why the desperate need for more school places? Allowing overdevelopment in the area?


page1image8424
Title
page1image9616 page1image10040
Braywick Court School Lease
page1image11984
Responsible Officer(s)
page1image13576 page1image14000
David Scott Head of Education Strategy and Commissioning
Mark Shephard Development and Property Manager
page1image15792
Contact officer, job title and phone number
Ann Pfeiffer Service Leader –Sufficiency and Access 01628 796364
Richard Harris Property Services 01628 796084
Member reporting
Cllr Phillip Bicknell
Lead Member for Children’s Services
Cllr MJ Saunders
Lead Member for Planning & Property Services (including Maidenhead)
For Consideration By
page1image24056 page1image24480
Cabinet
page1image25880
Date to be Considered
page1image27072 page1image27496
27 March 2014
page1image28640
Implementation Date if Not Called In
Immediately
Affected Wards
page1image31360 page1image31784
Bray
page1image33008
Keywords/Index
Free school, Braywick, lease
Report Summary
  1. The report recommends that an agreement to lease, two leases and a licence be granted to Bellevue Place Education Trust for a new primary school, to be called Braywick Court School.
  2. The leases cover two sites – the former Winbury School plus adjacent classroom and land, and the Braywick Nature Centre and surrounding areas. The licence will permit limited use of the Braywick Park car park for staff parking and pupil drop off.
  3. The Bellevue Place Education Trust will use the sites for a new Free school to be known as Braywick Court School.
  4. The Braywick Court School will open in September 2014 in the former Winbury school site. Once a new Nature Centre has been built elsewhere in the park - if planning permission is secured – the Free school will expand into the current Braywick Nature Centre space.
  5. The Braywick Nature Centre will be replaced by a new building – to be funded by the Education Funding Agency. The amount to be capped at £400k.
  6. If approved, the key financial implications for the Council are that the former Winbury School and the Braywick Nature Centre will be leased to Bellevue Place Education Trust for a term of 125 years at a peppercorn rent, in accordance with DfE expectations, and a licence fee will be paid for the use of
    Braywick Park car park.

7. This report to cabinet is considered necessary for the following reasons:
a. The recommendations include disposals of council property for 125 year term which restrict the council’s future use of the site.
  1. Disposals are at under value,as the proposed leases are at peppercorn rent.
  2. Disposal of public open space and the fact that if this land is counted by the DfE as playing field either now or in the future, it could fall under the legislative protection afforded to playing fields which may restrict the council’s future use of this part of the site.
  3. The potential,although unlikely,shortfall of in capital funding for the new nature centre.
If recommendations are adopted, how will residents benefit?
page2image8472 page2image8792
Benefits to residents and reasons why they will benefit
page2image10656
Dates by which residents can expect to notice a difference
page2image13056 page2image13480
1. An additional school,adding to the diversity of provision and number of school places.
2. A brand new building for the BraywickNatureCentre
September 2014 September 2015